I can update the text as follows:
As a result,
the use of '.home.', both as specified in RFC7788, and for other uses
is deprecated.
This should not be taken to mean that an explicit allocation by ICANN
is superseded;
this deprecation refers to uses of '.home.' as practiced at the time of
publication
of this document.
As you can see, though, this is somewhat problematic, which is why we took out
similar text previously. I think this new text is less problematic than the
old text, but personally I still prefer to just let people wonder what
"deprecated" means. I would actually rather leave it ambiguous, in the sense
that this would also discourage ICANN allocating '.home.' as a GTLD. However,
I suspect that there are people on the IESG who understand this issue better
than I do, and so I would appreciate it if you would discuss this during the
telechat, if you read this in time, and see if you can get a consensus from the
IESG on what to write here. I am happy to make this change or not make it, as
you all decide.
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-homenet-dot-13: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-dot/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "As a result, the use of '.home' is deprecated."
> I had to double-checked that .home was NOT in
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml
> .home was specified/requested in RFC7788 but never requested to IANA according
> to RFC6761. If mentioned in the draft, this info might help others...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
