Hi homenet, Since there has been no objection raised to changing the status of this draft from Informational to Proposed Standard, the change has been made. If you do have a strong objection, though, I'd like to hear it.
The reasons in favor of the change are: - the main reference, draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis, is currently Proposed Standard - there exist multiple, interoperable implementations of this reference - no drafts proposing other homenet routing protocol profiles have been submitted - avoids needing to create a new revision (with new RFC number) at a later time to change from Experimental Barbara > -----Original Message----- > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 2:55 PM > Subject: Re: [homenet] homenet-babel-profile: status experimental? > > > Currently the draft has intended status of "Experimental". > > That's what Mark told me to do. > > > Given the intended status of 6126bis is Standards Track (and HNCP (RFC > > 7788) is also Standards Track), would it make sense to make > > homenet-babel-profile Standards Track as well? > > Yes, I think so. > > > This question does depend on which Babel spec homenet-babel-profile > > will reference (6126 or 6126bis). [I sent a separate email with > > comments related to references.] If homenet-babel-profile is going to > > use 6126 as its spec reference, then Experimental probably would make > more sense. > > It's going to use 6126bis. > > -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
