>> If there is a more complex HNCP network, then we could probably simulate >> the L2 scenario with VXLAN, configured by HNCP.
> If memory serves, VXLAN requires support for multicast, which HNCP+Babel > doesn't provide. There's a set of IBM (?) extensions to VXLAN that avoid > the use of multicast, I'm not a fan. Another issue is that since VXLAN emulates a layer 2 network, it doesn't have any means to regulate MTU; hence, it requires either network-layer fragmentation or the use of jumbograms. Not a fan, sorry. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
