Any opinions on this from authors/list? My take would be that this can be rejected as inclusion of full stops within quotes is stylistically correct and that there's no technical issue with including the root's dot in a DNS name. But maybe some other convention has been followed for DNS RFCs in the past?
Cheers, S. On 02/01/2021 08:27, RFC Errata System wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8375, "Special-Use Domain 'home.arpa.'". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6378 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Kulvinder Matharu <ksmath...@gmail.com> Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- "home.arpa." Corrected Text -------------- "home.arpa" Notes ----- The domain "home.arpa." is used throughout the document. The domain should, instead, be "home.arpa". Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8375 (draft-ietf-homenet-dot-14) -------------------------------------- Title : Special-Use Domain 'home.arpa.' Publication Date : May 2018 Author(s) : P. Pfister, T. Lemon Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Home Networking Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
