So the critizised typo was even worse: revalent or relavent or renteval instead of correct "relevant" - more variations ????
################################################################# Am 06.10.2010 um 22:40 schrieb Johann Illich: > Hans P wrote: > relevant not revalent ! > Sorry. > I must say: it was RELAVENT > Hans please read carefully!!!! > :-) > Don't suicide! > You never! :-)) > > Best wishes, Hans Illich > > > _______________________________________________ > post: [email protected] > unsubscribe or set options at > https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com _______________________________________________ post: [email protected] unsubscribe or set options at https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org
