before this goes too far, I am going to chime in here, and everyone is welcome 
to ignore me if they so choose. 
Valkhorn wrote: 
It's not theory. You  either hear the pitches or you do not. Hearing tests  are 
pretty  objective. You are given a range of frequencies for both ears and you  
either hear them or do you don't.

True. This is based on many medical studies on the physical reception 
mechanisms 
in the ear and how they vibrate.  It is also true that this is seldom the case 
for the average human, however. However the degree to which we can 
differentiate 
frequency [="pitch"]changes   alters as the frequency rises. Essentially the 
higher the frequency, the broader the pitch change has to be before we can 
recognize it. 
There is a parameter known as "threshold"  which means the level of loudness 
that a given pitch must be at before we can "hear" it.  In other words when a 
frequency range of hearing is done, a critical component of the test is the 
threshold at which it becomes perceptible to the subject   For example, 
Valkhorn 
probably truly does have the ability to hear an 14 khz tone and recognize when 
it changes to 14.5khz.  Herr Pizka may also have the same ability.  The 
difference may be that Valkhorn can still hear everything at a lower loudness 
level than Hans, who may have to have the loudness several degrees louder to 
hear it.  Or it may be the reverse.  Thus simply saying that one can hear 
pitches in a certain range does not tell the whole tale - the real issue is how 
loud does it have to be before you can hear it?  
In medical circles the more prioritized concern seems to be studying how 
threshold loss is related to frequency loss, and how to prevent both.  
Threshold 
loss is the most common type of hearing loss and is the one that millions of 
people experience after too-loud concerts - that ever famous "ringing in the 
ears" phenomenon that disappears after a certain time.  The current concern is 
to determine how much of that can occur before permanent damage is done.  
To summarize - the whole "I can hear pitches you can't" argument is baseless 
without knowing the loudness parameters at which you can do so.  
My apologies to those who felt this was too pedantic - I seem to be in a 
writing 
mood tonight. 
Paxmaha
  

________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, November 11, 2010 6:43:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Hornlist] A=5000

You're right, how foolish of me to base my opinions on facts...

-William


In a message dated 11/11/2010 12:56:27 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

It´s  theory that humans are able to hear pitches up to 20.000 Hz, but very 
few do  it.
Just feeling it or just noticing it is not enough. I talked about  
distinguishing a certain
pitch. That makes the difference.

And,  aren´t there surveys about hearing abilities in our societies ? 
Didn´t  they
come out telling us, that the hearing abilities not only of the  elderly 
are fading out, but
also of the younger & the very young  generations as being exposed to the 
acoustical
pollution or self imposed  extreme noise high & sublow with high amplitudes 
???

Please,  William, do not start another war of words, as we do not disagree 
on the  matter, 
but we view it from different standpoints only. You go for the  mere facts, 
perhaps, while 
I go for the qualities of the hearing sense,  perhaps.

###################################################################
Am  11.11.2010 um 18:32 schrieb [email protected]:

> It's not theory. You  either hear the pitches or you do not. Hearing 
tests  
> are pretty  objective. You are given a range of frequencies for both ears 
and 
>  you  either hear them or do you don't.
> 
> I can not only  hear pitches above 5,000 hz, but I can distinguish 
whether  
> or  not I'm hearing them.
> 
> -William
> 
> 
> In a  message dated 11/11/2010 11:13:01 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
>  [email protected] writes:
> 
> In  theory, just in theory. But  you cannot hear nor distinguish a 
certain 
> pitch  above 5.000  Hz.
> 
> And a greater majority of all people in our  westernized  society has 
severe 
> hearing loss. 
> 
>  But I admit, you might feel the  extreme high pitches, - even painful in 

> your ear, or the extreme
> low  pitches in your stomache -  can make you  vomiting.
> 
>  ########################################################################
>  Am  11.11.2010 um 17:53 schrieb [email protected]:
> 
>>  The human ear can  usually hear from 20Hz to 20,000Hz. 
>>  
>> If you cannot hear above  5,000 Hz, then you probably have  severe 
hearing 
> 
>> loss.
>> 
>>  _http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/03/can-you-hear-this-hearing-test/_  
>>  (http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/03/can-you-hear-this-hearing-test/)  
>> 
>> I have only halfway decent speakers - so I probably  can't  output the 
> higher 
>> frequencies. I made it to  12kHz only. It must be  all that time near 
> large  
>> computer equipment, or my  speakers.
>>  
>> -William
>> 
>> 
>> In a message   dated 11/11/2010 10:48:20 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
>>  [email protected] writes:
>> 
>> Hello  Hans  Illich,
>> 
>> good calculation, 
>> but A-5000  corresponds to a 4-times   smaller E-flat 0,44% sharp, 
>>  if we take A=440 as the base. 
>> 
>> Based  upon  A=440: E-flat=311,13
>> the corresponding  fraction of 5000 be  312,50  which is 0,44% sharp.
>> This E-flat  near 5000  Hz  would be 22Hz sharp  and be in the 5th 
octave 
> =  
>> E-flat´´´´´
>> thus exceeding most peoples  hearing   capabilities.
>> 
>> Or explained  musically:
>> two octaves  higher than the  notated high  E-flat, written with 3 
ledger 
>> lines above staff
>> in  concert  notation (=sound as written). It  might be notated as  
trebble 
>> clef plus "octava  2" above
>> or similar.  
>> 
>> It would also mean, that A-5000 does not    exist, if we go after human 
>> naming of pitches.
>>  
>> Mei  liawa ! Oba bist  guad im kalkulian. Liawe   griass
>> 
>>  ###############################################################
>>  _______________________________________________
>> post:    [email protected]
>> unsubscribe or set options at    https://pegasus
>>  .memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/valkhorn%40aol.com
>>  _______________________________________________
>> post:  [email protected]
>> unsubscribe or set options at  
>  https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com
>  
> _______________________________________________
> post:  [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at  
>  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/valkhorn%40aol.com
>  _______________________________________________
> post:  [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com

_______________________________________________
post:  [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/valkhorn%40aol.com
_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/paxmaha%40yahoo.com



      
_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to