In the opening message of the thread "HOT governance tasks, please read!", 
Mikel said:

"The one thing we do need to decide is which organization would receive HOT’s 
assets in the event of dissolution. This must be an existing US 501(c)3. One 
suggestion so far has been the EFF, but this hasn’t progressed past the idea 
stage. So, suggestions welcome."

Am I correct in thinking that EFF = Electronic Frontier Foundation?  If yes, 
then I don't like this option.  I'd prefer to see the assets going to an 
organization involved in humanitarian aid, in particular disaster relief.  I 
did a little looking around in Wikipedia and found a few potential names in 
this area such as (I've verified that these are 501(c)(3) organizations):
* AmeriCares: "AmeriCares is a nonprofit disaster relief and humanitarian aid 
organization which provides immediate response to emergency medical needs – and 
supports long-term humanitarian assistance programs – for all people around the 
world, irrespective of race, creed or political persuasion." (quote from 
http://www.americares.org/aboutus/ ).
* Sahana Software Foundation (their 501(c)(3) application is pending): "The 
Sahana Software Foundation is dedicated to the mission of saving lives by 
providing information management solutions that enable organizations and 
communities to better prepare for and respond to disasters." (quote from 
http://sahanafoundation.org/about-us/ ).
* Portlight Strategies: "Co-opting with individuals as well as other 
organizations to cut through red tape in order to directly meet the specific 
needs of un-served, under served, and forgotten people" (quote from 
http://www.portlight.org/images/onesheet.pdf ).
...Portlight appears to have the focus on disaster relief that is consistent 
with HOT, but they are not that organized with respect to their online presence 
and might not be sufficiently tech enabled to take advantage of the assets ... 
in my opinion, based solely on reviewing their website.

Those are three and there are others potentially.  It would be useful to 
consider what you would intend to accomplish through a beneficiary.  Would it 
be continuation of activities?  Or uplift of an organization through asset 
receipt?  Or migration of membership into a new organizational structure (like 
or unlike the original)?  Or providing benefit and assuring stewardship through 
a long-term partner?  All things to consider when making the beneficiary 
determination.

Regards -- OSM user ceyockey

_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to