On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:33 PM, hyan...@gmail.com <hyan...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi hotties!
>
> Some of us are tracing polygons over tree areas, ones are using
> "landuse=forest" others "natural=wood" ¿which you consider more indicated?
> Mapping trees could be helpful for high level floods.
>

The project GeoBolivia [1] recommended us multiple use (agroforestry),
agricultural, forestry livestock and other places forest. This document
(official) is the territorial classification plan
goo.gl/6Dvmpk<http://t.co/KlmZJQt49Z>(in spanish).

It is very difficult seeing aerial imagery determined what type of forest is
. To my natural=wood is recommended, then the validation stage can contrast
with the official document.

Marco Antonio
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to