Hi Patrick,
Since we would not be displaying tweets but would be integrating them into
the OSM database that is where the issue is.
I believe this is the part of the guidelines that makes that an issue:
4. You will not attempt or encourage others to:
1. sell, rent, lease, sublicense, redistribute, or syndicate access to
the Twitter API or Twitter Content to any third party without prior written
approval from Twitter.
- If you provide downloadable datasets of Twitter Content or an API
that returns Twitter Content, you may only return IDs (including
tweet IDs
and user IDs).
- You may provide spreadsheet or PDF files or other export
functionality via non-programmatic means, such as using a "save as"
button, for up to 100,000 public Tweets and/or User Objects per user per
day. Exporting Twitter Content to a datastore as a service or other cloud
based service, however, is not permitted.
Thanks,
-Kate
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Patrick Meier (iRevolution) <
patr...@irevolution.net> wrote:
> Thanks Kate and Pierre, here's the info I got from a colleague at QCRI:
>
>
> Twitter's ToS do not forbid OpenStreetMap from displaying tweets, as long
> as they follow the content display and branding guidelines as outlined here:
>
> * https://dev.twitter.com/terms/display-requirements
> * https://about.twitter.com/press/brand-assets#twitter-content
>
> Twitter's ToS do limit OpenStreetMap in terms of how they can
> re-distribute tweets in machine-readable form:
>
> * https://dev.twitter.com/terms/api-terms section I.4.A
>
>
> ----
> Patrick P. Meier (PhD)
> http://www.iRevolution.net <http://www.irevolution.net/>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Kate Chapman <k...@maploser.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> Ah okay! So they potentially contribute to the same data set though,
>> right?
>>
>> The issue with the data is when you are looking at social media data the
>> data is bound to the Terms of Service of the social media platform. Other
>> than Flickr there isn't a way to declare an open license to your data.
>> People sometimes do declare things openly on other platforms, but honestly
>> it doesn't really mean anything since they are still bound to the Terms of
>> Service of the platform they are using. I'd be interested in looking at the
>> issues related to the amount of data taken from those platforms vs. the
>> added information added through microtasking tools and what this means for
>> intellectual property. It times of crisis it is easy to say "let's forget
>> about the license" but I think there are important issues to think about
>> related to the disaster management cycle.
>>
>> Meaning if you collect data however you can during an event, then how
>> does that feed into reconstruction? Further then into disaster
>> preparedness? How can we create communities around data especially during
>> the later reconstruction phases and then during preparedness to contribute
>> to lessen the impact of the next disaster?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -Kate
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Patrick Meier (iRevolution) <
>> patr...@irevolution.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hiya Kate,
>>>
>>> So AIDR and MicroMappers (MM) are two different platforms albeit
>>> integrated (I know, confusing). AIDR is used to collect Tweets and to
>>> create machine learning classifiers. MM is used to train AIDR to create
>>> machine learning classifiers. MM is also used to tag photos and videos
>>> posted on social media (independently of AIDR). Like I said, confusing : )
>>>
>>> @Paolo, I'm not involved in the activation of MM but Jus (cc'd) is, so
>>> she may be able to provide update/link on the MM deployment.
>>>
>>> @Kate, can you let me know what your concern is re license of the data?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Patrick P. Meier (PhD)
>>> http://www.iRevolution.net <http://www.irevolution.net/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Kate Chapman <k...@maploser.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Micromappers(1) has been activated for the flooding in Serbia and
>>>> Bosnia and Herzegovina. One question that came up was could that data be
>>>> useful for updating OpenStreetMap? At the moment they are collecting and
>>>> tagging any data that might be relevant, so I think a large percentage
>>>> wouldn't probably fit into what is usually mapped in OSM.
>>>>
>>>> One concern I see is the license of the data, but I wanted to get some
>>>> other opinions.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Kate
>>>>
>>>> (1)
>>>> http://irevolution.net/2013/10/01/aidr-artificial-intelligence-for-disaster-response/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> HOT mailing list
>>>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
