So the advice back to the mapper? My opinion would be if its readily identifiable as landuse=common then map it, but refrain from arbitrarily adding a circle tagged landuse=common close to each small village perhaps?
Personally when I'm mapping if something like this stands out then it gets mapped but its quite rare that I spot one. Thanks Cheerio John On 19 February 2015 at 08:59, Pierre Béland <pierz...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Hi John, > > Our role is to grab information, facilitate the logistic of the > humanitarian organizations. > > But we are not specialists. Once we have identified the common leisures, > the GIS specialists from the international organizations can easily extract > this info and examine further. > > Pierre > > ------------------------------ > *De :* john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> > *À :* "hot@openstreetmap.org" <hot@openstreetmap.org> > *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 19 février 2015 6h31 > *Objet :* [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad) > > Project 892 task 23 is an example. The following question got sent to me > probably because I've been validating merrily away. > > >What is the minimum diameter for a Helipad (leisure=common)? > > Based on my own experience of visiting a remote Scottish Island the local > football pitch, being smooth, level and firm enough was the designated > helicopter landing place. > > I'm not sure that you can tell enough from satellite imagery that a > certain bit of ground is smooth, level and firm enough to take the weight > of a helicopter. However we seem to have a fair number of circular > leisure=common areas tagged near fairly small villages. > > So can we flesh out a bit more of the requirements please and better > identify what we should be looking for and mapping. > > Thanks John > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
