If it is small and you are uncertain if it is a building, then I would not trace it as a building (particularly if there are no signs of occupation - paths or enclosures and such). Even if it is a building, it's most likely a hut and not significant to the relief effort (or other applications).
Caveat: I didn't view the sample you refer to, but I have seen similar objects to what you describe. Steve On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Pierre Béland <pierz...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > When you ask to validate objects like this, try to be more specific. The > best would be to give us the ID of one of these objects or to zoom in and > give us the osm url to point more precisely to this zone (Ctrl-J in JOSM). > > > Pierre > > ------------------------------ > *De :* john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> > *À :* "hot@openstreetmap.org" <hot@openstreetmap.org> > *Envoyé le :* Samedi 16 mai 2015 16h07 > *Objet :* [HOT] very small round objects in project/1048#task/90 > > Start at the bottom left and you'll see them in the fields. I suspect its > crops drying out they look very small for huts to me. Some have been > mapped as buildings. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks John > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
