I've sent something to the project manager maybe we'll hear something after the weekend.
Cheerio John On 7 May 2016 at 13:14, Mike Thompson <miketh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would also note that it looks like we have some relatively new (8 total > OSM change sets) mappers playing the role of validator and invalidating > tasks for things beyond the requirement of the project (e.g. "incorrect > paths set" when the project [#1844] only called for buildings). > > Mike > > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 7:02 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've been mapping and validating on Project 1800 but it doesn't make a >> lot of sense. >> >> The most difficult part to map is the built up areas with lots of very >> close buildings which in some ways I'd expect a city in Japan to have its >> own maps of buildings. Those tiles take time and lots of it. The buildings >> are so close together that you really need the building tool to map them >> rather than squaring them afterwards. >> >> These tiles by the way still have a lot of buildings to be mapped even >> though the project says 82% complete I'd say we're only a third the way >> through the buildings. >> >> Then we have lots of tiles over the ocean, nothing there, and many many >> tiles over forest, again not much to map. >> >> Could someone expand a little more on who has asked for the mapping and >> what it will be used for? >> >> Thanks John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> HOT@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
