On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:33:24AM +0000, Donal Hunt wrote:
> I would agree with the view that such statuses should be managed outside of
> the OSM datastore. Organisations with interest of doing this may already be
> using products that rely on GIS data from various sources.
> 
> For those designing apps, they can track things like damage, repairs, etc
> and tie that meta data to a OSM node / way / relation ID.
> 
> Is there an existing policy regarding data types that should not be added
> to OSM but tracked separately? Are there tools to support teams needing to
> so this?

Maybe Key:wikidata [1] and Key:wikipedia [2] could do the job?

[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata
[2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia

jiri

> Donal
> 
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, 10:06 Russell Deffner, <russell.deff...@hotosm.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > Just a quick note; HOT does not formally do damage tagging, mainly because
> > no tagging schema exists. In the past, members of HOT tried various tagging
> > but results for remote damage assessment were poor.
> >
> > I personally would be glad to see a community driven tagging schema
> > developed but if not we (HOT) will need to document what we come up with
> > for usage in disaster response and recovery.
> >
> > One glaring issue has been that typically the tags persist much longer
> > than the damage.
> >
> > =Russ
> >
> > > On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:49 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > It looks like HOT is using the tag 'damage' for something. It is not
> > documented as to what it means. Further is this information kept current or
> > just added and forgotten? In at least one case the tag goes back to 2011.
> > >
> > >
> > > When will HOT start to document what tags they are using, and what they
> > are used for on the OSM wiki? This is not good behavior for HOT in OSM.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > HOT mailing list
> > > HOT@openstreetmap.org
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > HOT mailing list
> > HOT@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> >

> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to