Michael, > Thanks for the quick reply - unfortunately it was deemed spam and since my > spam folder does not sync on my phone, I didn't see it until I forced an > update. > > I'd certainly be interested and willing to contribute to this effort as > well as to looking into a possible solution for GPGPUs, although I am > going to need some guidance and help. > > I will respond to each topic in its appropriate thread for continuity. > > Given that the modularization of HPX seems to be the key to the successful > integration of C++ modules, presumably, this should be fairly > straightforward - the library module boundaries should probably correspond > to the C++ module boundaries. > > Having said that, I will need someone to help me / review with me how to > map the hpx modules into Modules TD (e.g. "super" - modules which just > import other modules, which modules might be best broken into submodules, > etc.) > > Is there anyone in the community who might be interested and able to > provide some guidance?
The modularization effort is spearheaded by the guys at CSCS (Mikhal and Auriane, both should be subscribed here). They might be the best to contact in order to coordinate things. Alternatively, they normally can be reached through our IRC channel. Thanks! Regards Hartmut --------------- http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx > > Thanks, > Michael > > ---------- > On May 30, 2019 7:50:57 a.m. "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hey Michael, > > > >> I am wondering whether there are any plans in the short or mid-term > >> to provide support in HPX for the new Modules TS which is expected to > >> be part of C++20? > >> > >> > >> While compile times are not really the main benefit of modules, I > >> understand that we can expect to see some variable degree of > >> improvement when using modules as compared to the existing approach. > >> > >> > >> At a very early stage of the Modules TS, I took a quick look through > >> the HPX codebase to see whether I thought it might be possible at all > >> to try and add some conditional code to allow for possible modules TS > >> support and was quickly discouraged. > >> > >> > >> However, it also seems to me that the current modularization > >> initiative might make it possible to export HPX as modules. > >> > >> > >> Has anyone given this any consideration? > >> Is this an ultimate goal in anyone's vision? > >> Would an attempt to incorporate the features of the modules TS be > >> welcomed by the community? At least, perhaps, as a proof-of-concept? > >> > >> > >> I'd appreciate your thoughts and feedback > > > > This topic has not been discussed so far and I personally have not > > looked much into C++20 modules. However, I believe that the current > > modularization effort in HPX is most likely to help with introducing > > C++20 modules. Any help you might want to give would be highly > appreciated. > > > > Thanks! > > Regards Hartmut > > --------------- > > http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu > > https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > hpx-users mailing list > > hpx-users@stellar.cct.lsu.edu > > https://mail.cct.lsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/hpx-users > > _______________________________________________ hpx-users mailing list hpx-users@stellar.cct.lsu.edu https://mail.cct.lsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/hpx-users
