That made about as much sense as the \\\////\\\\ posts. Not that I'm wanting to get into philosophical discussions about the creation or recreation of anything in particular.
Egg came first: In the bEGGinning.... I haven't read the Torah much, but I don't remember the mentioning of a chicken in the scroll. Jon Mitten On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, glerm soares <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/5/6 Joseph Gray <[email protected]> > >> heh, oh yeah, it is. Though I have no control over the Pixa mailing >> list. Glerm can unsubscribe the bastard there. >> > > I like him/her... > > Hope it is not tottaly a bot, anyway is welcome to this vortex. And if it's > a total bot, it's nearly "cultured" (hahaha fala aê coisa)... > > I don't belive that a "non"-sense exists. There's a paradox about "nothing" > that maybe is better explained by some kind a self-replicable ποίησις , > really meaning it. > > If he/her could express some of the obscure syntax part maybe we can go > beyond the boundaries of English translated thoughts. > > Egg came first. The text says "In the Beggining there was nothing" - but > don't forget this riddle: there was the beggining. > > letherebeagain > > fin again, > > riverrun, > > leite de pedra > > cheers, > glerm > > -*-*--**---***-----*****--------******** > Harvard & Roy Arts Council > list options: > http://grauwald.com/mailman/listinfo/hrac_grauwald.com > -*-*--**---***-----*****--------******** > -*-*--**---***-----***** > -*-*--**---*** > -*-*--** > -*-* > -* > > -- Jon Mitten [email protected]
-*-*--**---***-----*****--------******** Harvard & Roy Arts Council list options: http://grauwald.com/mailman/listinfo/hrac_grauwald.com -*-*--**---***-----*****--------******** -*-*--**---***-----***** -*-*--**---*** -*-*--** -*-* -*
