According to Geoff Hutchison: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, J. op den Brouw wrote: > > wondering why the htdig web site links the developer link to > > sourceforge and not to /dev anymore. And why /dev is still around > > on the maindocs.... > > Ah, I forgot about all of this. When we moved to SF, we obviously needed > to get rid of dev.htdig.org and move to /dev at the very least. But for > the few documents, I didn't know if it was better just to host them in the > "Documentation" section of the SF project page. > > I don't think it matters much one way or the other, though granted having > them in the Documentation section means they won't be mirrored. > > So if people think we should move back towards having a full "developer > site," we should do it. Whatever will be the most effective.
Well, given our experience over the past year, I'd think that the more we rely on our own pages and the less we rely on SF pages, the more effective our site will be. I'd prefer we have our own developer site, with links to any SF services on which we rely, but relying on SF no more than necessary. As long as they don't start to clamp down on our web space, I think that's the better way to go. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766 Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930 _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
