On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Gilles Detillieux wrote: > Rather than traversing the whole database looking for a URL, though, > it may be more expedient to look up the ID for a URL in the index.
Right, though of course htpurge is written this way since it's primarily written to "clean up" after indexing. But yes, for removing arbitrary URLs, this would be faster. Maybe it'd be useful to write a separate routine for htpurge. > > As a note I will try to submit a patch and set of makefiles to do > > a native WIN32 port of HtDig & libhtdig this week. This would be great. I may have another announcement in the "big patch" department later this week as well. The mifluz merge is almost finished. -Geoff _______________________________________________________________ Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - http://www.cowanalexander.com/calendar _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
