These are fuzzy algorithms essentially. You could have endings:blah. You're right that it's undocumented, and it should probably be taken out of the parser. (Nice idea to have per-word fuzzy possibilities, but maybe not the right way to do it.)Could someone who knows what exact: and hidden: mean please explain what they are for (and/or document them officially)? I don't want to break anything while trying to fix the bug.
Well, this is the "normal" syntax used by other sites. As for user-defined fields, it's certainly an ultimate goal but I think it's more important to:On a related note, does anyone have any ideas for the syntax of "field restricted" searches? I was thinking of something like "title:word" to search for "word" in the title field, or "heading:word" etc. Was the plan to allow user-defined fields in meta-data to be searched?
a) get the new parser running.
b) get typical field-restricted searches like "title:word" going.
-Geoff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
htdig-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
