been set to a new HtCookieInFileJar object, which doesn't get deleted. Shouldn't the delete cookie_file statement be moved outside of the innermost if clause, and past the end of the else clause?
It is deleted later by the main function, through the base class HtCookieJar pointer.
expert on every piece of code added to 3.2. If you add a description to defaults.cc yourself, doing your best to describe it, I'll gladly fix any grammatical errors or ask you about ambiguities I find in the description, but I don't want to have to document things I don't understand or use. Ditto for testing - I can't test cookie support in htdig, because I don't use them on my system.
Sorry Gilles, I didn't explain myself correctly. I just wanted you to eventually correct my entry in the defaults file, as you know my english has a marked spaghetti accent.
I did not mean to ask you to test the cookies code, sorry about it! I was referring just to the description stuff (or maybe the distributed cookies.txt file).
I have switched to Debian now (my friends at my local LUG convinced my after years of RedHat) and hopefully tomorrow I'll be able to commit the code.
Ciao and thanks!
-Gabriele
--
Gabriele Bartolini - Web Programmer - ht://Dig & IWA Member - ht://Check maintainer
Current Location: Prato, Tuscany, Italia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~gbartolini | ICQ#129221447
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
