On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Neal Richter wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:47:40 -0700 (MST)
> From: Neal Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Joe R. Jah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] Compression related performance
>
>
> >> Jim,
> >> Thanks for the numbers. Pretty different from Joe's.
> >
> > Yes they are; can you explain it?
>
> #1) What is the size of wordlist_cache_size?
I haven't specified it in my htdig.conf file, so it must be the default
10000000.
> #2) wordlist_page_size?
I did vary that from 0, 1024, 2048, and 4096. The optimum number happens
to be 2048 in my system; however, when it comes to compression and no
compression my system performance has been consistently better with
compression, regardless of this factor.
> #3) Are either of you using a journaling filesystem?
I do not.
> #4) Does one of you have somekind of high performance disk-drive?
Here is my disk-drive system:
RAID 5 10K RPM, 1" Ultra3 (Ultra 160) SCSI Hard Drives.
> I'm pretty well stumped on this one if none of these 4 is different
> between you... we know the process is very I/O bound, so if one is much
> faster and all other things are equal...
>
> --
> Neal Richter
> Knowledgebase Developer
> RightNow Technologies, Inc.
> Customer Service for Every Web Site
> Office: 406-522-1485
Regards,
Joe
--
_/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o
_/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_
_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_)
_/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[email protected]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
