Thanks for the suggestion. I will try the 3.1.5 you suggest.
The gcc I got was all pre-built and should have included everything, but
I shall get the gcc source and make it myself , try it with 3.2.0b3 and
report back.
Many thanks,
Brian
Geoff Hutchison wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Brian S. Craigie wrote:
>
>>I am having problems compiling both htdig 3.1.2 and beta (3.2.0b3) on
>>Solaris 8 (sparc) with gcc 2.95.3 (the latest non-beta gcc)
>>
>
>First off, I wouldn't use 3.1.2. Period. See
><http://www.htdig.org/RELEASE.html> for release notes. Get 3.1.5
>now--previous versions of the 3.1 releases have a fairly serious security
>hole.
>
>You don't mention what problems you're having with the 3.1 releases, but
>from the messages with the 3.2.0b3 code, it looks like the compiler
>doesn't like the libio headers--I'm assuming you installed the libraries
>for that particular compiler release? Did you install these from binaries
>too?
>
>(I've never had problems with a compiler that I've bootstrapped and
>installed myself.)
>
>>I haven't tried compiling on gcc 3.x but if anyone thinks this would
>>
>
>No. We've had reports that the new C++ code in gcc 3.0 doesn't like some
>of the constructs in currently released versions of ht://Dig. I'm taking a
>look as soon as I have a chance.
>
>--
>-Geoff Hutchison
>Williams Students Online
>http://wso.williams.edu/
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with
>a subject of unsubscribe
>FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
>
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a
subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
