According to Mark Alexander:
> Sorry - Don't have gcc 2.95 use any more - all my other programs compile
> under 3.0.
>
> Will live with the current situation, until another version is
> released.
This is the problem. Everyone seems to want to wait until Geoff or I fix
everything. Well right now, Geoff and I don't use gcc 3.0, so unless someone
with gcc 3.0 shows some willingness to help us figure out what needs to be
changed in the code to make it compile, the next version isn't going to be
any more gcc-3.0-compliant than the current version.
> >>> "Geoff Hutchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/04/01 06:47a.m.
> >>>
> At 8:46 AM +1200 8/29/01, Mark Alexander wrote:
> >Tryed compiling 3.1, no luck. Tryed 2.95, no
> >luck. Installed 2.95 binaries, same problem
> >compiling htdig.
>
> And the exact error messages from gcc/g++ were? With the 2.95
> release, I'm assuming you've tried compiling other C++ programs and
> they're fine?
So, what's up with gcc 3.0? Are exact error messages and a bit of assistance
too much to ask?
--
Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766
Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a
subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
