> 1) I was trying 3.2 because I thought the searching multiple dbs would > make this eaiser.
Fair enough. We only recommend using 3.2 if you're willing to live with the beta nature of the releases and need to use a particular feature in 3.2. (e.g. collection support, phrases, regex limits, etc.) > 2) Read the man page of htdig about the -m. the url file should be urls > delimted by space correct? Does htdig recursively spider these urls? > How does limit_urls_to and exclude_urls affect this? No, indexing is only set to index one "hopcount," i.e. only those URLs. No limits are applied to them--the limits are applied to links examined during indexing. > 3) I wasn't trying to run the concurrently, but just not to choke the > system and let it deal w/ smaller chunks. Sure. Just letting you know that if you do this, it'll take longer than one "super long" run over the whole batch. -- -Geoff Hutchison Williams Students Online http://wso.williams.edu/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
