On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 08:46 AM, Pub Litics wrote:
technophobic]. Or, do you strongly recommend that we go with 3.1.6? Whatever you say, we'll do. We are on a shared server, however, and do not have root access, so that had been a problem in the past and could possibly be an obstacle now. Just let us know what you recommend.
We strongly recommend using 3.1.6, for security and stability reasons: <http://www.htdig.org/RELEASE.html>
underline characters, so, at present, there are no hidden characters in htdig.conf file, at all. Is that the way it is supposed to be? Does that answer your question, adequately?
Yes, I'd assume this is exactly what Gilles wanted to know.
Finally, I did not check the file date-stamp, because, as I mentioned, I think it is now working, by excluding the proper sub-directories.
Good to hear that it's working! Cheers, -- -Geoff Hutchison Williams Students Online http://wso.williams.edu/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
