Re: [htdig] further info on last modified issue

[Jim Cole]

Sorry. I didn't notice that you were working with a 3.2 beta until after sending the last message. The time handling is different in 3.2. The patch is inappropriate and it appears that RFC 1123 is supposed to be supported. Please disregard my earlier comments.

Jim

On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 12:14 AM, Jim Cole wrote:

On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Vince LaMonica wrote:

I ran htdig with -vvvvv and here's the results for the page that does not
show the correct last modified time. The system this is running on is:

...

Since I have use_doc_date set to true, it shouldn't matter what the header
includes anyway, since i've set the META date tag correctly.

...

Tag: META name="date" content="Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:10:54 GMT", matched 20

I believe the only format supported is ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss). The time portion is considered optional by ht://Dig.

Also note that there is a bug in the date parsing code. A patch and brief explanation of the problem is located at ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/metadate.0.

Jim



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html