On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 01:01, Jim Cole wrote:On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 01:45 PM, Kevin Breit wrote:
I am indexing using ht://dig (whatever is on RH8) using a custom conf
For various reasons, you might be better off running something other than what Red Hat provides. For a production server, you should probably drop back to 3.1.6. If you want (or need) some 3.2 beta functionality, a recent snapshot might be a better choice.
*sigh* As a matter of fact, we're running RH9. Does this make a difference?
I believe Red Hat 9 has a somewhat more recent 3.2 beta snapshot. Since it is a development snapshot, it is hard to say whether this is a good thing or not; sort of depends on the day they grabbed the snapshot. The only version that is currently recommended for production is 3.1.6. Use of the 3.2 series is generally only recommended for cases where new functionality is required (e.g. phrase searching) or people are interested in helping with testing/debugging.
Jim
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
