I'm glad you resolved your problem. Unfortunately, all is still not well with the mailing list archives. The old archives, up to October 2002 are accessible, but all from November 2002 on (the ones archived by SourceForge's own mailing list archive) are still inaccessible, as they were when I checked on Friday and Tuesday. They finally posted a note about this today on their site status page:
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1 ( 2004-01-15 08:12:54 - Mailing List Service ) ML archives are down for unplanned hardware maintenance. We currently anticipate that they will be back up on January 16th. The mailing lists are still functioning and the messages are being stored for display in the ML archives after they are brought back on-line. Unfortunately, their archives seem to go down for some unplanned reason or other with startling frequency. I find that when I need to check the archives, they seem to be down almost one time in three. Additionally, it seems something has changed with the archives that has broken indexing since about October 2003, which I just discovered last week. I've been waiting since then for the archives to come back online so I can update the index for the past four months (once I figure out why the indexing wasn't working). Somehow I doubt their archives have been offline all that time, so I expect some formatting changes of some sort have resulted in our preprocessing script no longer finding the snippet of message to be indexed from each archive page. I'll keep checking every few days until I can get something to look at. In the meantime, you can also access the list archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/htdig-general%40lists.sourceforge.net/ and http://www.mail-archive.com/htdig-dev%40lists.sourceforge.net/ According to Justin Kerr: > I'm sorry. It turns out the test phrase I was using had a 2-letter word > (which is shorter than the minimum word length of 3). > > All is well. Thanks anyway! > > -j > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin > Kerr > Sent: January 13, 2004 2:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [htdig] 3.20b5: "and" method not working via CLI > > > Hi, > > I apologize if this has already been raised here, but I am unable to > access > the list archives. > > I recently upgraded from 3.1.6. to 3.20b5. I created all new databases, > but > I'm using the same configuration file from 3.1.6 untouched. > > I have had no trouble indexing and searching. All of may pages are > being > indexed and I'm seeing good results from htsearch. > > My site uses a PHP wrapper that calls htsearch from the command line, > and > parses the template output. > > Unfortunately, I can't get "and" method match to work. It returns the > exact > same number of matches as "or" for any number of keywords entered. > > Am I missing a new 3.20b5-only configuration directive? Do I need to > update > my conf file? -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/ Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ ht://Dig general mailing list: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ht://Dig FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-general
