No, it's the same version of htdig and the identical config file.
Unfortunately.
We seem to be getting somewhat inconsistent results; it was faster the
next time I fiddled with it, or so it seemed to me. Nothing else is
going on on the box except an Interchange site with one user, so it
pretty much has all the resources to itself. Odd that it would not be
consistent.
We like the minis because cabinet space at the colo is expensive, but I
think we are probably going to abandon the experiment for now and use
the mini for something that's not so disk I/O intensive.
janine
On Jul 15, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Jim wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Janine Sisk wrote:
If the problem is the slow disk drives then using OS X probably isn't
going to help. But if it's something in Yellow Dog Linux, then it
might. I just don't know how to tell where the bottleneck is.
Did you by chance change versions of ht://Dig when you moved things to
Yellow Dog? If so, you might want to get rid of the YDL package, if
that
is what you are using, and build a new version from source that matches
what you were using before.
I assume you are using a config file that is equivalent to what you had
in the old machine? If not, you might want to check into the
differences. Changes to things like the search algorithms could make a
big difference in performance.
Jim
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig general mailing list: <[email protected]>
ht://Dig FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-general
