On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Ichi Brown wrote: > I have a brief question about use_doc_date. I have some pdf's who's parser > output is as follows: > > <head> > <title>Stripped</title> > <meta name="Author" content="Copyright 2006 Army Times Publishing Co."> > <meta name="Creator" content="Asura Version 8.0"> > <meta name="Producer" content="OneVision PDFengine (Build 16.044.R)"> > <meta name="CreationDate" content="20061127120000-05'00'"> > </head> > <body> > <pre> > > I have enabled use_doc_date: true in my configuration file, and the document > date still shows the file modification date. This can't be the case. I was > wondering if i'm setting the wrong meta name for use_doc_date. I was > wondering what the meta field it was looking for should read. Thanks in > advance for any suggestions.
I believe the meta name needs to be one of the following in order to take advantage of use_doc_date. date dc.date dc.date.created dc.data.modified There are also some restrictions on the date format that are dependent upon the version of ht://Dig that you are using. Finally, if you are using version 3.1.6 you might also need to patch the code for proper date support. ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/metadate.0 Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ht://Dig general mailing list: <[email protected]> ht://Dig FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-general
