On Jan 17, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Marco Houtman wrote: > The other thought of going to 3.2.0 did cross my mind but I’ve been > playing around with that one some two years ago when I tried and > succesfully compiled that version on Windows. When comparing this > version with 3.1.6 I’ve noticed it has some performance issues. It > was much slower that 3.1.6 in our tests. Worth a look if the > request for extra memory is denied and the two v’s can’t help me > solve this problem. I don't think that a move to 3.2 will solve any performance issues related to indexing, unless it is by way of a side effect (e.g. different memory usage pattern that reduces swapping). Due to feature enhancements in 3.2, such as phrase searching, the indexer must do more work and manage more data. Based on all reports I have see, as well as personal experience, indexing with 3.2 is significantly slower.
Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ht://Dig general mailing list: <[email protected]> ht://Dig FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-general
