Geoff,
The majordomo 2 license is based upon the Apache Group's license, with the
copyright...
Copyright (c) 1997, 1998 Jason Tibbitts for
The Majordomo Development Group.
All rights reserved.
Jason is amiable and would probably be willing to answer your questions if
this is the sort of arrangement you, Andrew, & Co. would like. His address
(omitted here for UBE reasons) appears at the bottom of
http://www.hpc.uh.edu/majordomo/
On another issue, I'm wondering if you've considered adding hooks for
content-encodings in version 4. At first glance, it would be fairly easy
to make an ExternalDecoder class in the style of ExternalParser, but
IIRC you're planning to rewrite ExternalParser after 3.1 is released.
Thanks,
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
> >I just noticed that all the docs have
> >
> >"ht://Dig � 1995-1998 Andrew Scherpbier"
> >
> >Any suggestions on what to do about this?
> >It would be ok with me if the copyright stuff was removed from the pages. (I
> >still get lots of email directly because of that! :-))
>
> I've updated the README and whatever source files I've touched. If anyone
> wants to crunch sed on the htdocs folder, I'd appreciate it.
>
> But this brings up a good point... I'm no legal expert, but can we
> copyright something like:
> Copyright (c) 1995-1999 The ht://Dig Project
>
> This would be in the same style as Apache. I think we need something like
> this on all of the source files too, with some mention of GPL and being a
> part of the ht://Dig source. But I'd also prefer to avoid FSF-style
> copyright assignments.
>
> Does anyone know if the Apache Group requires copyright assignments? Does
> anyone know if we can just copyright as I illustrated, or do we need some
> sort of legal agency?
>
> -Geoff
>
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.
