According to Geoff Hutchison:
> 
> On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> 
> > Sounds good to me.  I'd like to wrap up 3.1.2 before too long, because there
> > have been a lot of bug fixes since 3.1.1.  I think I backported most non-DB
> > changes from 3.2 to 3.1.2 now, but there was the whole Makefile include
> > business that I wasn't sure about.  If you think it's an appropriate
> > bug fix for 3.1.2, could you put it in?
> 
> It's not a big deal, but it's a bit of a pain to backport (because it
> requires a whole bunch of stuff). It lets the makefiles work with Berkeley
> make. I would lean towards leaving it out because no onre complains much
> about it and it would require hitting every makefile.

No arguments here.

> > I was also wondering about this last change to htdig.cc in 3.1.2:
> ...
> > Is there an advantage to doing this rather than testing excludes.hasPattern()
> > before doing a excludes.FindFirst()?  I was wondering why in some cases,
> > one approach is used, and in other cases, another is used.
> 
> No, there isn't a real advantage. Using excludes.hasPattern() is probably
> more elegant, but I was doing the equivalent of the advice I give everyone
> else--never set exclude_urls to null, set it to something that could never
> occur.
> 
> I'll switch it. If you know of *other* occurences where this happens,
> please let me know.

"htsearch/Display.cc" line 630:
        URLimage.Pattern("<<<");

That's the only other one I've noticed so far.  I guess a grep for Pattern
might help, but I have a bus to catch.  Ciao!

-- 
Gilles R. Detillieux              E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre       WWW:    http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba  Phone:  (204)789-3766
Winnipeg, MB  R3E 3J7  (Canada)   Fax:    (204)789-3930
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.

Reply via email to