[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As far as I can see the prefix compression routine (__bam_defpfx)
> is only used to eat CPU. This is a major drawback, IMHO. I think we should
> get feedback from sleepycat on this subject. Could they give us the
If you can get me the source, I'll contact Sleepycat and ask about the
results. From previous experience, they're willing to answer questions
like this.
> reduced if prefix compression worked. If we can't make it work, we're toasted.
> I somehow hope I'm completely wrong :-)
No, basically this is the case. But if prefix compression doesn't
actually work, then there's a bug in the Sleepycat code because they
advertise prefix compression and don't offer it. ;-) So we shouldn't be
completely toasted since they should be able to show us how it works.
-Geoff
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.
