Geoff Hutchison writes:
> > * Shared libraries for distinct functionalities ?
I volunteer for this. No surprise :-)
> As for loic's request about * Shared libraries for distinct
> functionalities, I'm not sure if it should go into 3.2. At this point, I
> guess I'll say this much: I don't know a timetable, but any code that I
> listed as '?' is a project that I felt would be nice, but shouldn't hold
> up release.
I'll take a very short time frame, incremental approach for
this. First I'll make a list of what we would like to have. Then
discuss for approval. Then start splitting, one library at a time:
for example: move word database manipulation functions/files in a
directory, make it a shared library, make sure it does not break
anything, run the tests, commit changes.
If we do it this way 3.2 can be released even if the separation in
functionaly distinct shared libraries is not finished. Only when the
separation is finished will we implement the possibility for the user
or developper to specify which shared library must be used, i.e. give
the user or developper the ability to chose an alternate solution.
In other words this point must not hold the release, IMHO.
--
Loic Dachary
ECILA
100 av. du Gal Leclerc
93500 Pantin - France
Tel: 33 1 56 96 09 80, Fax: 33 1 56 96 09 61
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.senga.org/
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.
