>
> It might make sense to add wide (UCS-4) string functions to
> libunicode, but I don't know how far down this road I want to go. My
> goals are really pretty modest, but they are also fairly fuzzy and
> undefined.
>
Thanks for being honest :-) The question then is, after all, should we
use libunicode for htdig ? We need a general purpose, portable library
that implements all the functions needed to enable Unicode handling in htdig.
If possible we would like to have a library that requires no contribution
from us, or as few as possible. Is libunicode the answer ?
Cheers,
--
Loic Dachary
ECILA
100 av. du Gal Leclerc
93500 Pantin - France
Tel: 33 1 56 96 09 80, Fax: 33 1 56 96 09 61
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.senga.org/
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.
