According to Geoff Hutchison:
> At 11:33 AM -0600 2/23/00, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> >What do all of you think is preferable?  On the one hand, the name does
> >seem to imply that only local urls should be dug, so Geoff's approach
> >does make sense.  However, my approach gives you more flexibility in that
> 
> Yes, but with the scope of the new server and URL-dependent config, I 
> felt this was the right way to go. Anyone who wanted to set non-local 
> indexing could do so and people wouldn't get confused as to the 
> purpose of the attribute.
> 
> My $0.02 at least...

Good point.  I was forgetting about the new scoping capability in 3.2.
Right now, local_urls_only is only interpretted globally, but it should
probably be interpretted at the server scope, so you could set it on a
server by server basis if you wanted to.

-- 
Gilles R. Detillieux              E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre       WWW:    http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba  Phone:  (204)789-3766
Winnipeg, MB  R3E 3J7  (Canada)   Fax:    (204)789-3930

------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
You will receive a message to confirm this. 

Reply via email to