Geoff Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For debugging, I use:
>
> CFLAGS="-g -Wall -W" CXXFLAGS="-g -W -Wall" ./configure [other options]
compiling with the above gives identical search results (meaning, gives the
same false matches) as before. Only noticable change is that 'make' gives a
lot more warnings than before (log-make-err has 536 lines, mostly things
like "missing initializer", as opposed to 6 when the same source is compiled
with default options). So, the optimization isn't it. grr.
> Depending on how much you want to work, I'd consider trying the latest
> gcc: gcc-2.95.2 from <http://gcc.gnu.org/> It *shouldn't* be a problem
> with the compiler, but the gcc releases are carefully checked to
> attempt to cut down on compiler bugs with each new release.
If there was a gcc binary lying around somewhere, I might give that a
try...but I'd rather not compile GCC if I can avoid it.
....
Geoff had earlier written:
> If it actually gets a null list (rather than an ignored word), it would
> return no matches. I've verified this on both the 3.2.0b2 release and the
> current snapshots.
have you verified on either release that a word giving a null list ANDed
with a word giving a populated list returns no matches? That is, have you
verified that this bug is completely specific to my machine; or, have you
duplicated it on another machine?
Thanks again,
arthur.
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
