In local.h3dig-dev you write:

>> 
>> That was my thinking too. I also felt that if duplicate detection was a
>> configuration attribute (potentially on a pre-URL or per-server basis),
>> then it wouldn't be as big of an issue.

>Oh, right.  It didn't occur to me when reading Toivo's patches that this
>was not an optional feature.  Making this feature selectable by a config
>attribute is a must, IMHO!

Yes, it think it should be optional, the duplicate detection and also
the extracting links from duplicate pages. 

I've been running my htdig version against the web here for about
a day (it takes two days to complete) and looking at the output
the relative link problem is not a great one but I have found
one case of it happening so there will have to be a way of handling
it if it causes a problem, it won't be in the first version of
my code though.




-- 
 Toivo Pedaste                        Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 University Communications Services,  Phone:  +61 8 9 380 2605
 University of Western Australia      Fax:    +61 8 9 380 1109
"The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things"...



------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
You will receive a message to confirm this. 


Reply via email to