According to Geoff Hutchison:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, J. op den Brouw wrote:
> > Compile seems okay.
> > Still getting this problem....
>
> Yup. I still get it too. Still don't have the foggiest why we're getting
> it since we're using exactly the same configuration defaults as Loic used
> in his mifluz tests.
>
> I'd be inclined to rip the whole merge out and wait until Loic can tak ea
> look at it. It's a bit of a pain to do this, but we'd get 3.2.0b3 out,
> which I think is needed.
>
> So what do people think? Two related votes:
> * Leave out the new mifluz merge (going back to the 0910 snapshot)
> (i.e. finish when Loic can take a look at the problems)
Unless Loic has passed away, or there's no chance of him looking at this
in the next month, my personal preference would be to hold off and try to
get this running in the upcoming beta. Otherwise, it'll really require
another beta cycle to get that ironed out.
> * Leave Quim's new QueryParser code until after 3.2.0b3 release
> (i.e. leave in current buggy parser.cc code)
Which is buggier right now? Or is Quim's new code still being developed?
Is there an ETA for it? Again, I'm of the mind that we should try to get
the big changes in now so that they'll get tested by the beta testers
sooner rather than later. If this waits till b4, it likely won't get a
good workout until the new year.
--
Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766
Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
