Geoff,
I have two different htdig.conf files so I don't see how I could be merging
the database into itself. The -m points to one and there is an implied -c
that points to the default. I assume that the whole purpose of htmerge is so
that you can create several small databases and then combine them into one
large database. Is this correct? Can I not do this?
Regards,
Robert
Geoff Hutchison wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Robert La Ferla wrote:
>
> > /opt/www/bin/htmerge -s -m htdig.conf
> [snip]
> > I have over 200MB of virtual memory free on my RedHat 6.2 Linux system.
> > Shouldn't htmerge be able to handle this without a fault? I am running
> > the latest snapshot (htdig-3.2.0b3-121700). Is my data now corrupted?
>
> I'm not quite sure what your default config file is--with most normal
> setups, you'd be merging the database of htdig.conf into itself. But I
> digress. Yes, your data may very well be corrupted.
>
> Whhy does it take so much memory? Because the htmerge code is a
> quick-and-dirty version I wrote that Loic said he'd help me fix later for
> the new mifluz/htword code. And while there's surely a better way to do
> it, Loic hasn't responded to e-mail in a while.
>
> Loic, if you have time, I'd really like to do some merging of the code...
>
> -Geoff
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
