At 8:34 PM -0400 10/20/98, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
>You're right. The second < should be a <
>
>Here's an excerpt from
>http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/global.html#h-7.4.4.2
>
>> Note. When a property specified by a META element takes a value that is a
>> URI, some authors prefer to specify the meta data
>> via the LINK element. Thus, the following meta data declaration:
>>
>> <META name="DC.identifier"
>> content="ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1866.txt">
>>
>> might also be written:
>>
>> <LINK rel="DC.identifier"
>> type="text/plain"
>> href="ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1866.txt">
>
>Maybe you could hack up htdig to support the LINK tag?
I'm not sure this will do exactly what you desire. While this can be added,
it greatly complicates matters and probably still doesn't help the case of
an image-as-description.
What do you link? The image? The data will be ignored since it's a binary file.
HTML markup to the image? The markup may be ignored or transformed by the
program, producing a description of "<img src='http://www.foo.com/1.gif'>"
which wouldn't be very good.
-Geoff Hutchison
Williams Students Online
http://wso.williams.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the body of the message.
