> > any ideas...? I'd like to have a go at implementing it, as I think > > it would be a worthwhile addition... > > Why? I'm not a fan of shared_cache, personally. It's no faster than > file_cache and total pain to adminster. I generally work in > Apache/mod_perl and use the straight memory cache.
We also use Apache/mod_perl. The reason is that quite often there will be 20 instances of Apache running (ie we get may requests per second). I'd like to reduce the memory usage a bit. And yes I know that running H::T::E is slow, but speed is not the problem, where as memory pressure can be (on ocassions). If you think its not worth it, then no big deal... cheers, Mathew ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click _______________________________________________ Html-template-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
