On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Sam Tregar wrote: > > That's right, but I think it runs on a delayed update from the real > CVS source.
yes, I got it a few hours later. > > I am using this as I had a number of cases when suddenly part of my tests > > did not run and I did not get any warning about this. > > That's very weird. Did your code die() or seg-fault or something? If > so Test::Harness should notice and produce a 'dubious' result, not an > 'ok'. I don't know any more but if I encounter the same code again, which I cannot avoid, that's work, I'll try to find it out again what was the issue. > How about no_plan all the time? I can't stand updating magic numbers. OK, I can't have it all my way after all :) > Computers are supposed to do my counting for me! Hmm, they do, but you better tell them up front how long to count :) (I know, you'll say something: till the end of the file) Gabor ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Html-template-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
