On 3 Dec 2004, at 21:16, Jason Purdy wrote:
I'm not sure if you're just trolling me here w/ that simple response, but I did talk about how I didn't want to use TT. I don't believe adding support for CDBI would be overloading it, just making it easier to use. If you're still skeptical, it could be done as an extension or plugin such that it doesn't add any "bloat" to the core.
HTML::Template's strength is its simplicity. It does a couple of things perfectly
and leaves the rest to "real" code. The separation of almost everything except
display is strong. Build the data structure and let H::T do the rest.
The project I'm working on right now has HTML::Template, Text::Template *and*
TT, each used for specific purposes.
Jason
David Hodgkinson wrote:On 3 Dec 2004, at 20:52, Jason Purdy wrote:While I'm thinking about this, what do you guys think about these?Use the Template Toolkit. HTML::Template does what it does very well. Don't overload it.
-- Dave Hodgkinson CTO, Rockit Factory Ltd. http://www.rockitfactory.com/ Web sites for rock bands
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Html-template-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
