On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:21:07 -0500 (EST)
Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > But I do have a syntax question.  I was looking at your example (the
> > Headline one) and it didn't initially feel right.  It seems almost like
> > it could be handled in a more XMLish way.  Like:
> 
> I like it.  It would make writing the parser for HTML::Template::Component
> a bit more complicated but I think that would be a reasonable tradeoff for
> the increased ease of use.
> 
> So, who's going to write it?

I will. Or, I did! 
http://bulknews.net/lib/archives/HTML-Template-Component-0.01.tar.gz

Note:
* Needs more tweaks to adjust various ways to call HTML::Template::new()
* use base qw(HTML::Template::Component) is not necessary in my
  version :)


Patches and suggestions are welcome.

--
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to