On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Philip S Tellis wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Phil Oertel wrote: > > Thank you. And before I go on, I'd like to ask. Sam, is it okay to > discus h-t-j issues here, or should we just stick to template issues.
It's fine to talk about the Java version here. As long as it supports HTML::Template syntax it's HTML::Template enough for me! If it starts to get to be too much then you could start marking the messages with "[java]" so people can filter them out if they like. > > that you've chosen not to use java.util.regex. Is that because you > > anticipate few developers will have version 1.4? > > Yes, that is the main reason. In fact, the people who are using it > right now (my organisation) still use 1.2 and I can't get them to > change. I've tried to keep it independent of anything not in 1.2, but > it seems like it even works on 1.1. I think I remember seeing an open-source regex library for Java that supported 1.2... Maybe that would be an option? It should be on JPAN and easily installable with org.sun.JPAN, right? ;) -sam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
