On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Sam Tregar wrote:
> This reminds me - I could catch this mistake automatically by looking
> through the loop for match references. I think I should do that. It
> could be turned off with "strict => 0" if people actually want to be
> able to have the same hash in a loop twice...
using strict for two things isn't a good idea (<TMPL_FOO>)
maybe add an option -> duplicate_hashes_in_loops which defaults to 0.
--
Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but withstand progress.
-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
