DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34909>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34909 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-14 11:48 ------- I did some further research. I am certain that given the same auth challenge and the same cnonce value both HttpClient versions produce the same credentials hash ('response' attribute). The only obvious difference is slightly different arrangement of attributes in the auth response. I do not think this should matter but currently this is the only plausible theory that can explain the failure HttpClient 2.0: =============== Digest username="domain\username", realm="Digest", nonce="b2a83a38cd57c501af3ad2c91f189512060524424ffc2b818c9920db15cd247a9d47cf5a789d63c6", uri="/", qop="auth", algorithm="MD5-sess", nc=00000001, cnonce="a9b7ba70783b617e9998dc4dd82eb3c5", response="22c567093b3689e1edf4184fad8218d3", opaque="1704373a505e74c4ec692978e5c1a539" HttpClient 3.0: =============== Digest username="domain\username", realm="Digest", nonce="b2a83a38cd57c501af3ad2c91f189512060524424ffc2b818c9920db15cd247a9d47cf5a789d63c6", uri="/", response="22c567093b3689e1edf4184fad8218d3", qop="auth", nc=00000001, cnonce="a9b7ba70783b617e9998dc4dd82eb3c5", algorithm="MD5-sess", opaque="1704373a505e74c4ec692978e5c1a539" Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
