DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37211>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37211 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-24 15:42 ------- Sebastian, This is my personal opinion, so take it for what it is worth. There are several aspects to this issue (1) Non-technical. None of the HttpClient committers appears to have a taste for writing documentation. Most of the work on HttpClient documentation is driven solely by the needs of the user community, that is, if the trouble of repeatedly answering similar types of questions over and over again is greater than that of writing a user guide. I fully admit HttpClient 3.0 documentation leaves a lot to desire, but I rather see our limited resources spent on HttpComponents / HttpClient 4.0 redesign (2) Technical. Leaving the defaults undocumented allows us to change them without having to maintain backward compatibility with previous releases. If an application requires a certain behavior or HTTP spec compliance one should explicitly set relevant parameters rather than rely on default settings. Anyway, we never turn down documentation patches, so feel free to reopen the issue and submit a patch Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
