DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37445>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37445 Summary: Part.isRepeatable() should be abstract Product: HttpClient Version: 3.0 RC4 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Commons HttpClient AssignedTo: [email protected] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Part.isRepeatable() indicates if Part.sendData may be call multiple times reliably. Part.sendData() is abstract but Part.isRepeatable is not, always returning true. Part.isRepeatable should be abstract and implemented in the same class as Part.sendData(). StringPart would always return true, FilePart would delegate to PartSource, and FilePartSource and ByteArrayPartSource would also return true. This would allow a non-repeatable InputStream to be wrapped by a PartSource and correctly indicating it is not repeatable. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
